[V+ Perspective] Inertia Thinking: The Trap Most Easily Disguised as Experience

Inertia Thinking vs. Experience: Catalyst or Constraint?

In decision-making and innovation, we often rely on two forces: experience and inertia thinking. On the surface, both seem to stem from the “accumulation of the past,” yet in practice, they can lead to very different outcomes—one becoming the foundation of wisdom, the other an invisible shackle.

Inertia Thinking: The Risks Hidden Behind Comfort

Inertia thinking refers to our psychological tendency to follow familiar patterns. It has its advantages:

• When facing similar situations, we can react quickly, without having to rethink everything from scratch.

• In high-pressure or urgent environments, it can even boost efficiency.

However, the pitfalls of inertia thinking shouldn’t be ignored:

• It can make us overlook new variables and keep “solving new problems with old methods.”

• In fast-changing industries, inertia thinking often becomes an obstacle to innovation.

As management guru Peter Drucker reminds us:

“The greatest danger in times of turbulence is not the turbulence; it is to act with yesterday’s logic.”

The biggest risk in turbulent times isn’t the turbulence itself, but acting with yesterday’s logic.

Experience: Wisdom Accumulated—or Just Another Bias?

Unlike inertia, experience is the result of organizing and reflecting on past events. It brings us principles and insights:

• Doctors can quickly diagnose thanks to years of clinical experience.

• Investors, through numerous cases, can judge whether an investment is reasonable.

But experience isn’t always reliable. It can turn into another form of bias:

• “I’ve seen this model before; it won’t work”—ignoring the environment has changed.

• “The old way worked for me, so it must work now”—resulting in overconfidence.

Simply put:

Experience is conscious learning; inertia is unconscious repetition.

How to Tell If You’re Using Experience or Inertia?

Ask yourself these three questions:

1. Did I verify my assumptions?

   • If you’re acting just because “it worked before” → that’s inertia.

   • If you can explain with “market structure, business logic, data support” → that’s experience.

2. Did I consider environmental changes?

   • Ignoring competitors, regulations, or market cycles → inertia.

   • Pointing out common principles and adapting accordingly → experience.

3. Can I teach this judgment to someone else?

   • If all you can say is “just trust me” → inertia.

   • If your reasoning is clear and repeatable → experience.

The Psychology Behind It: System 1 & System 2

Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman, in Thinking, Fast and Slow, proposed that our brains operate with two thinking systems:

• System 1 (Fast Thinking): Quick, intuitive, automatic, effortless.

  • Pros: Fast reactions for daily or dangerous situations.

  • Cons: Easily swayed by biases and inertia.

  • Examples: Hitting the brakes at a red light; instantly dismissing a type of startup as “doomed.”

  • 
    

• System 2 (Slow Thinking): Deliberate, focused, energy-consuming.

  • Pros: Enables logical reasoning, data analysis, long-term planning.

  • Cons: Drains mental energy, can’t be used for everything.

  • Examples: Calculating 37 × 29; scrutinizing TAM/SAM/SOM and financial reports before investing.

Inertia thinking is almost always the product of System 1, while experience only becomes truly valuable when System 2 transforms past cases into logical principles.

Four Methods: Leverage Experience, Break Free from Inertia

Suppose Company A is an Experience Management (XM) SaaS startup developing a new module to help businesses collect and analyze customer feedback.

Historically, they held a deeply rooted assumption: “The more features, the better—the product will be more competitive.” This project became their turning point for breaking free from inertia.

1. Ask “Why”

Pause during decision-making to check if the premise still holds.

For example, when Company A’s engineering team suggests adding every possible survey feature—multi-page forms, AI analytics, cross-platform integration, even speech-to-text—the product manager asks, “Why do we think customers want the most features? Maybe what they really need is a tool to quickly gather useful feedback.”

That “why” challenged the team’s inertia: “more features = more value.”

2. Validate Assumptions

Treat experience as a hypothesis to test with data or small experiments, not as a direct solution.

The team retained their “more features” assumption but decided to validate it through customer interviews and data testing. Results showed: enterprise clients do value comprehensive features, but in practice, they only use 2–3 core functions (e.g., quick NPS surveys and real-time feedback). Extra features actually made the system complicated, reducing usage frequency. This proved that “feature stacking” is often an inefficient investment, sometimes even hurting product experience.

3. Bring in Outside Perspectives

Discuss with people from different backgrounds to break free from mental ruts.

This time, Company A invited real users to a design workshop. While engineers insisted, “the more features, the more customers rely on us,” user reps countered, “Reply rates matter more than feature lists. We don’t have time to explore 20 features; we just want actionable insights fast.”

The team shifted course: they launched a “core, streamlined” module focusing on the top three features and offered API extensions for advanced clients. This external perspective made the team realize the value of simplicity often exceeds complexity.

4. Upgrade Your Experience

Regularly review successes and failures to distill principles—avoid rigid “rules.”

After the project, Company A didn’t just launch a market-fit product; they also distilled the experience into a principle:

“Every new feature must first define: Who’s the target user? What pain point does it solve? What’s the core scenario? Only then consider expansion—not feature-stuffing from day one.”

This principle turned their experience into organizational know-how that can be repeated.

The XM case of Company A clearly demonstrates:

• Asking why → Breaks the “more features is better” assumption.

• Validating assumptions → Uses data to reveal true high-frequency needs.

• Bringing in outside perspectives → Surfaces overlooked pain points from consultants and users.

• Upgrading experience → Turns a single lesson into a replicable design principle.

In the end, they created a more accurate, user-friendly real-time experience management module, boosting user engagement and response rates.

Conclusion

The difference between inertia thinking and experience lies in awareness and reflection:

• Inertia brings automatic reactions—efficient but blind to change.

• Experience requires validation and organization to become wisdom that can be repeated and shared.

In a fast-changing market, the real challenge isn’t lack of inspiration, but whether you can avoid using yesterday’s logic to solve today’s problems.

When we learn to ask “why,” test our assumptions, seek outside views, and upgrade experience into principles, we can make experience a driver for innovation—not a constraint.

Ultimately, the key to decision-making and innovation isn’t how much of the past you’ve accumulated, but whether you can continuously break free from inertia and keep your experience alive.